Who is NOT Fashion Illustrators?
A、Hatty Pedder
B、Miuccia Prada
C、David Downton
D、Mega Antoniuk
A、Hatty Pedder
B、Miuccia Prada
C、David Downton
D、Mega Antoniuk
Style, Not Fashion
Style. goes way beyond fashion: It is the distinctive way we put ourselves together. It is a unique blend of spirit and substance-personal identity imposed oil and created through the world Of things. __________ (46) It is what people really want when they aspire to be fashionable. (if they aren&39;t just adorning themselves in status symbols).
Through clothes, were invent ourselves every time we get dressed. Our wardrobe is our visual vocabulary. Style. is our distinctive pattern of speech, our individual poetry.
Fashion is the least of it. Style. is, for starters, one part identity: self-awareness and self-knowledge. __________ (47) And style. requires security-feeling at home in your body,physically and mentally. Of course, like all knowledge, self-knowledge must be updated as you grow evolve; style. takes ongoing self-assessment.
Style. is also one part personality: spirit: verve, attitude, wit, inventiveness. It demands the desire and confidence to express whatever mood one wishes. Such variability is not only necessary but a reflection of a person&39;s unique complexity as a human being. __________ (48) In order to work, style. must reflect the real self, the character and personality of the individual; anything less appears to be a costume?
Lastly, style. is one part fashion. It&39;s possible to have lots of clothes and not an ounce of style.
But it&39;s also possible to have very few clothes and lots of style. Yes, fashion is the means through which we express style, but it takes fewer clothes to be stylish than you might imagine.
Whatever else it is, style. is optimism made visible. Style. presumes that you are a person of interest: that the world is a place of interest that life is worth making the effort for. It also shows that you are morally responsible. It shows that you don&39;t buy things at the whim of the marketplace or the urging of marketers. __________ (49) Style. exposes people&39;s ambivalence over good looks.
It always demonstrates that appearances do count. Deep down we suspect this, since we ourselves make judgments about others from how they look.
No one should be penalized for not having style, of course, but those who have it are distinctive and thus more memorable. __________ (50) They announce to the world that they are in command of themselves.
第46题___________ 查看材料
A.It is a way of capturing something vibrant, making a statement about ourselves in clothes.
B.Fashion is part of style.
C.Rather, you focus on what is personally suitable and expressive.
D.You can"t have style. until you have a sense of who you are.
E.They create a unique identity for themselves and express it through grooming and a few well-chosen clothes.
F.People want to be themselves and to be seen as themselves.
A、α1-adrenergic receptors
B、α2- adrenergic receptors
C、β1- adrenergic receptors
D、β2- adrenergic receptors
E、β3- adrenergic receptors
此题为判断题(对,错)。
A、一份从纽约发来的基于首脑的传真通知说原价将扣除百分之五。
B、纽约总部发来传真通知原价下调百分之五。
C、一份从纽约发来的以总部为基础的传真通知说原价将扣除百分之五。
D、纽约总部发来传真通知按原价百分之五打折。
Ever since the economist David Ricardo offered the basic theory in 1817, economic scripture has taught that open trade—free of tariffs, quotas, subsidies or other government distortions—improves the well-being of both parties. U.S. policy has implemented this doctrine with a vengeance. Why is free trade said to be universally beneficial? The answer is a doctrine called "comparative advantage".
Here's a simple analogy. If a surgeon is highly skilled both at doing operations and per forming routine blood tests, it's more efficient for the surgeon to concentrate on the surgery and pay a less efficient technician to do the tests, since that allows the surgeon to make the most efficient use of her own time.
By extension, even if the United States is efficient both at inventing advanced biotechnologies and at the routine manufacture of medicines, it makes sense for the United States to let the production work migrate to countries that can make the stuff more cheaply. Americans get the benefit of the cheaper products and get to spend their resources on even more valuable pursuits. That, anyway, has always been the premise. But here Samuelson dissents. What if the lower wage country also captures the advanced industry?
If enough higher-paying jobs are lost by American workers to outsourcing, he calculates, then the gain from the cheaper prices may not compensate for the loss in U.S. purchasing power.
"Free trade is not always a win-win situation," Samuelson concludes. It is particularly a problem, he says, in a world where large countries with far lower wages, like India and China, are increasingly able to make almost any product or offer almost any service performed in the United States.
If America trades freely with them, then the powerful drag of their far lower wages will begin dragging down U.S. average wages. The U.S. economy may still grow, he calculates, but at a lower rate than it otherwise would have.
A、in favour of
B、afraid of
C、prevented
D、ended
B.No matter how we will do the task
C.Whether we will go outing or not
D.Unless they come to see us
A、The story of universal history
B、The story of origins
C、The story of the origins of the nation of Israel
D、The story of the origins of the World
为了保护您的账号安全,请在“简答题”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!