题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
The five alleged Russian spies in Ukraine were supposed to
A．conceal a camera into a pen.
B．get espionage equipment.
C．give bribes to Ukraine officials.
D．acquire military secrets.
安装简答题APP，拍照搜题省时又省心！
更多“The five alleged Russian spies…”相关的问题
SECTION C NEWS BROADCAST
Directions: In this section you will hear everything ONCE ONLY. Listen carefully and then answer the questions that follow. At the end of each news item, you will be given 10 seconds to answer the questions.
听力原文： Russian authorities are questioning five men suspected of taking about a dozen school children hostage and commandeering a helicopter for a ten million dollar ransom. The alleged gunmen were captured early Monday in southern Russia ending a four-day drama. The kidnappers initially demanded to be flown to Iran but police now believe their only aim was ten million dollars paid by the government, most of which has now been recovered.
Which of the following statements is TRUE？
A．Five gunmen were flown to Iran in a helicopter.
B．Most of the ransom was retrieved in the end.
C．The children were held for five days.
D．The authorities have passed sentence on the gunmen.
North Korea threatened on Tuesday to abandon the armistice because they
A．intended to have direct negotiations with the U. S.
B．prepared for the American preemptive attack.
C．wanted to take a decisive step for many years.
D．thought it possible the armistice would bind them.
North Korea threatened on Tuesday to abandon the armistice because they______.
A．intended to have direct negotiations with the U. S.
B．prepared for the American preemptive attack
C．wanted to take a decisive step for many years
D．thought it possible the armistice would bind them
The charges were announced by Judge Raed Juhi, chief investigative judge of the tribunal. They are connected with a 1982 series of detentions and executions after an assassination attempt on Saddam in Dujayl.
Charges against five other men were announced in February. The men will not be tried individually.
"With this announcement, the [tribunal] has raised this historic trial to a new level where the accused stands before justice which will rely on evidence," Juhi said.
No trial date was announced, but under Iraqi law Saddam could stand trial as early as September, because of a minimum 45-day period following referral for trial.
On July 8, 1982, a convoy carrying Saddam traveled through the town of Dujayl, a Shiite village north of Baghdad, and was attacked by a small band of residents.
A series of detentions and executions in the town followed the incident. According to the tribunal, 15 people were summarily executed and some 1,500 others spent years in prison with no charges and no trial date. Ultimately, another 143 were put on "show trials" and executed, according to the tribunal.
Speaking from Rome, Italy, an attorney for Saddam questioned whether a trial would ever be held at all.
"As of today, we still do not have a single document purporting to be anything where we can be ready for trial, and after their own rules ... we will require ... time to be able to prepare a defense," said Giovanni di Stefano. "Anything other than that would make it a farce."
Which institute has brought its first charges against Saddam Hussein？
A．The Iraqi government.
B．The Iraqi state council.
C．The Iraqi Special Tribunal.
D．The U.S. military court.
A.如果Rus>Ruk,那么E=F
B.如果Rus>Ruk,那么E
C.如果Rus>Ruk,那么E>F
D.如果Rus
Buyer made the advance payment, but Seller did not deliver any goods. Buyer urged Seller to deliver the goods immediately, as its production would be seriously affected by the short supply of the goods. However, Seller declared force majeure as the reason for non-delivery. Seller insisted that it was only a trading company, not a producer of the chemical products. Seller alleged that upon the conclusion of the contract, it entered into a purchase agreement with a producer to buy the goods from the latter. Due to a fire accident, the producer could not supply the goods under the purchase agreement; Seller therefore could not deliver the goods to Buyer. Non-delivery of goods was due to force majeure that caused the failure to supply the goods by the producer to Seller.
Buyer refused to accept Seller’s argument and bought 10,000 kg of the same products for replacement at a price of RMB 220 yuan/kg, resulting in a total extra cost of RMB 200,000 yuan. Meanwhile it filed a lawsuit against Seller in the court, requesting liquidated damages of RMB 400,000 yuan (20% of the total price) and the damages of RMB 200,000 yuan for extra price caused for the urgent purchase.
Required:
Answer the following questions in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Contract Law, and give your reasons for your answer:
(a) state whether Seller’s argument of force majeure can be established; (5 marks)
(b) state whether Buyer’s claims for liquidated damages and damages should be supported by the court. (5 marks)
为了保护您的账号安全，请在“简答题”公众号进行验证，点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证，验证成功后方可继续查看答案！
微信搜一搜
简答题
微信搜一搜
简答题
如搜索结果不匹配，请 
