A.Help them with their studies.B.Employ them as lab assistants.C.Teach classes at thei
A.Help them with their studies.
B.Employ them as lab assistants.
C.Teach classes at their high school.
D.Pay them for participating in the study.
A.Help them with their studies.
B.Employ them as lab assistants.
C.Teach classes at their high school.
D.Pay them for participating in the study.
A.They are vulnerable.
B.They have no sense of their shortcomings.
C.They take pride in their weaknesses.
D.They look weak to other people.
听力原文: This incident occurred one morning outside Albert Schweitzers hospital in the African jungle. A patient had gone fishing in another mans boat. The owner of the boat thought he should be given all the fish that were caught. Dr Schweitzer said to the boat owner, "You are right because the other man ought to have asked permission to use your boat. But you are wrong because you are careless and lazy. You merely twisted the chain of your canoe round a palm tree instead of fastening it with a padlock. Of laziness you are guilty because you were asleep in your hut on this moonlit night instead of making use of the good opportunity for fishing." He turned to the patient, "But you were in the wrong when you took the boat without asking the owners permission. You were in the right because you were not so lazy as he was and you did not want to let the moonlit night go by without making some use of it." Dr Schweitzer divided the catch among the fisherman, the boat owner, and the hospital. Questions 19 to 21 are based on the passage you have just heard. 19. Why did Dr Schweitzer settle the argument? 20. What did Dr Schweitzer tell the men? 21. What was the final judgment?20.
A.He told the men that both men were completely right.
B.He told the men that both men were completely wrong.
C.He told the men that each was partly right and partly wrong.
D.He told the men that one man was guiltier than the other.
B.The fish should go to the owner of the canoe.
C.The fish should be sold to every one involved.
D.Everyone involved should get a third of the fish.
B.Appointments must be made two weeks in advance.
C.The man can have an appointment with the doctor on Friday.
D.The doctor has cancelled his appointments on Friday.
B.His support for drinking Chinese green tea.
C.His surprise at China"s recent development.
D.His wonder at the growth of India"s IT industry.
A.Making School Buses Even Safer for Children
B.Seat Belts Needed on School Buses
C.Alternate Safety Devices and Procedures
D.Safety in and Around School Buses
Most people dont leave their front door unlocked, and the same is true of their home Wi-Fi networks. But some believe that preventing access to your wireless Internet actually does more harm than good. Peter Eckersley of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an organisation devoted to defending digital rights, is calling for an "Open Wireless Movement" and encouraging people to be "socially responsible" by sharing their connection. Eckersley compares the current situation of locked-down networks to "finding yourself parched(干透的)and thirsty while everyone around you is sipping from nice tall glasses of iced water", and offers a technological solution. We restrict access to our networks for two reasons: to prevent other people from using up our bandwidth, and to ensure our security and privacy. He suggests we can still protect ourselves from both problems by using routers(路由器)that share a certain amount of bandwidth in the open while also providing an encrypted(加密的)connection for personal use, but such technology already exists, and people arent choosing to use it. Perhaps the problem is not technological, but legal, as home users dont want to be responsible for the activities of others on their network. Quite understandable, really. But Eckersley says that "individuals can enjoy the same legal protections against liability as any other Internet access provider", but the law is far from clear in this area and differs from country to country. In a footnote on his article, Eckersley says US law "may" offer protection, but that didnt prevent a man who left his network open from being called a paedophile(恋童癖者)by armed police in his living room this past weekend. Courts in Germany have previously ruled that people can be fined if they allow unauthorised users to access illegal materials through their connection, while in the UK disputes over recent changes to the law leave the matter uncertain. Perhaps these legal concerns can be overcome by turning to an unlikely role-model — Estonia, where access to the Internet is a legal human right. The country is blanketed in a network of free Wi-Fi access points in cafes, bars and other public locations, allowing people to easily get online almost anywhere. So who wants to open up their network first?
What does the author say about the Electronic Frontier Foundation?
A.It encourages people to share their networks.
B.Its work is about protecting digital rights.
C.It is advocating an "Open Wireless Movement".
D.Its main business is trading electronics.
为了保护您的账号安全,请在“简答题”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!