题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

The Supreme Court has ______in the last 50 years.A.declared 100 federal laws unconstitutio

The Supreme Court has ______in the last 50 years.

A.declared 100 federal laws unconstitutional

B.declared over 1,000 state laws and 100 federal laws unconstitutional

C.defended civil liberties more often than property rights

D.defended property rights more often than civil rights

提问人:网友laiyizhan 发布时间:2022-01-07
参考答案
查看官方参考答案
如搜索结果不匹配,请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“The Supreme Court has ______in…”相关的问题
第1题
The Supreme Court infers the power of _________from Article III of the Constitution.

A、judicial independence

B、the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution

C、judicial review

D、the legislative actions

点击查看答案
第2题
The Supreme Court's recent decision allowing regional interstate banks has done away with one restriction in America's banking operation, although many others still remain. Although the ruling does not apply to very large money-center banks, it is a move in a liberalizing direction that could at last push Congress into framing a sensible legal and regulatory system that allows banks to plan their future beyond the next court case.

The restrictive laws that the courts are interpreting are mainly a legacy of the bank failures of the 1930's. The current high rate of bank failure—higher than at any time since the Great Depression—has made legislators afraid to remove the restrictions. While their legislative timidity is understandable, it is also mistaken. One reason so many American banks are getting into trouble is precisely that the old restrictions make it hard for them to build a domestic base large and strong enough to support their activities in today's telecommunicating round-the-clock, around-the-world financial markets. In trying to escape from this restrictions, banks are taking enormous, and what should be unnecessary, risks. For example, would a large bank be buying small, failed savings banks at inflated prices if federal laws and states regulations permitted that bank to explain instead through the acquisition of financially healthy banks in the region? Of course not. The solution is clear. American banks will be sounder when they are not geographically limited. The house of Representative's banking committee has shown part of the way forward by recommending common-sense, though limited, legislation for a five-year transition to nationwide banking. This would give regional banks time to group together to form. counterweights to the big money-center banks. Without this breathing space the big money-center banks might soon extend across the country to develop. But any such legislation should be regarded as only a way station on the road towards a complete examination of America's suitable banking legislation.

The author's attitude towards the current banking laws is best described as one of ______.

A.concerned dissatisfaction

B.tolerant disapproval

C.uncaring indifference

D.great admiration

点击查看答案
第3题
Owner's equity increases with increases in owner capital contributions, or increases in profits of the business.
点击查看答案
第4题
Here's James Robbins. The regime derives legitimacy from the 11 system,
点击查看答案
第5题
The government has failed to r_________(扭转) the economic decline.
点击查看答案
第6题
The Imagist writers followed the following three principles except ____.

A、direct treatment

B、economy of expression

C、clear rhythm

D、blank verse

点击查看答案
第7题
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.

California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies. The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.

They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smart phone — a vast storehouse of digital information — is similar to, say, rifling through a suspect’s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one’s smart phone is more like entering his or her home. A smart phone may contain an arrestee’s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of “cloud computing,” meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.

Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.

As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.

But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.

26. The Supreme Court will work out whether, during an arrest, it is legitimate to

A.prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents.

B.search for suspects’ mobile phones without a warrant.

C.check suspects’ phone contents without being authorized.

D.prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones.

The author’s attitude toward California’s argument is one ofA.disapproval

B.indifference

C.tolerance

D.cautiousness

The author believes that exploring one’s phone contents is comparable toA.principles are hard to be clearly expressed

B.the court is giving police less room for action

C.citizens’ privacy is not effectively protected

D.phones are used to store sensitive information

Orin Kerr’s comparison is quoted to indicate thatA.the Constitution should be implemented flexibly

B.new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution

C.California’s argument violates principles of the Constitution.

D.principles of the Constitution should never be altered

The author believes that exploring one’s phone contents is comparable toA.getting into one’s residence

B.handling one’s historical records

C.scanning one’s correspondences

D.going through one’s wallet

点击查看答案
第8题
Les Français du Midi sont plus généreux en bises que les Ch'tis.
点击查看答案
第9题
The main source of most prestigious universities is federal or state funds in addition to fees
点击查看答案
账号:
你好,尊敬的用户
复制账号
发送账号至手机
密码将被重置
获取验证码
发送
温馨提示
该问题答案仅针对搜题卡用户开放,请点击购买搜题卡。
马上购买搜题卡
我已购买搜题卡, 登录账号 继续查看答案
重置密码
确认修改
欢迎分享答案

为鼓励登录用户提交答案,简答题每个月将会抽取一批参与作答的用户给予奖励,具体奖励活动请关注官方微信公众号:简答题

简答题官方微信公众号

警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“简答题”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

微信搜一搜
简答题
点击打开微信
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反简答题购买须知被冻结。您可在“简答题”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
微信搜一搜
简答题
点击打开微信