题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
安装简答题APP，拍照搜题省时又省心！
更多“Any claim by the Buyers on the…”相关的问题
SECTION B PASSAGES
Directions: In this section, you will hear several passages. Listen to the passages carefully and then answer the questions that follow.
听力原文： Before we get to the student center, I'd like to show you Darney hall, one of the five co-ed undergraduate residence halls of the university. Just next to it is Darney dining-hall. Since there are only a few small kitchens in the dorms, most students buy meal contracts, which entitle them to twenty meals a week at any of the cafeterias. With the exception Of Sunday evenings and vacation breaks, dining-halls like Darney are open every day for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Students simply present their meal tickets at the door and go through the line, helping themselves to as much food as they want. While dietitians work hard to offer students a nutritious and well-balanced diet, many of your young men and women claim that Darney food, like most dorm food, leaves much to be desired. However, there are certain times, especially around Thanksgiving and Christmas, when the dining-hall staff goes all out preparing seasonal specialties, together with steak and seafood. These dinners are always exceptional and well attended. But regardless of what cooking, Darney is a good place to get together with friends and to meet new people, as is the student center which is coming up on our right.
Why do most students buy meal contracts？
A．They are free to have their meals any time for their convenience in the dorm kitchens.
B．They have more choices of eating at any cafeterias rather than being limited in the small dorm kitchens.
C．They can eat in Darney dining-hall during the vacation time.
D．They can eat as much food as they want with the meal contracts.
The ideas we have in America about the private ownership of productive property as a natural and universal right of mankind, perhaps of divine origin, are by no means universal and must be viewed as an invention of man rather than an order of God. Of course, we are completely trained to accept the idea of ownership of the earth and its products, raw and transformed. It seems not at all strange; in fact, it is quite difficult to imagine a society without such arrangements. If someone, some individuals, didn't own that plot of land, that house, that factory, that machine, that tower of wheat, how would we function？ What would the rules be？ Whom would we buy from and how would we sell？
It is important to acknowledge a significant difference between achieving ownership simply by taking or claiming property and owning what we tend to call the "fruit of labor." If I, alone or together with my family, work on the land and raise crops, or if I make something useful out of natural material, it seems reasonable and fair to claim that the crops or the objects belong to me or my family, are my property, at least in the sense that I have first claim on them. Hardly anyone would dispute that. In fact, some of the early radical workingmen's movements made (an ownership) claim on those very grounds. As industrial organization became more complex, however, such issues became vastly more intricate. It must be clear that in modem society the social heritage of knowledge and technology and the social organization of manufacture and exchange account for far more of the productivity of industry and the value of what is produced than can be accounted for by the labor of any number of individuals. Hardly any person can now point and say, "That--that right there--is the fruit of my labor." We can say, as a society, as a nation--as a world, really--that what is produced is the fruit of our labor, the product of the whole society as a collectivity.
We have to recognize that the right of private individual ownership of property is man-made and constantly dependent on the extent to which those without property believe that the owner can make his claim, dependent on the extent to which those without stick.
According to the passage, the concept of ownership probably ______.
A．resulted from the concept of property right
B．stemmed from the uncovered prehistoric ages
C．arose from the generous blessing of the Creator
D．originated from the undetected Middle Ages
The ideas we have in America about the private ownership of productive property as a natural and universal right of mankind, perhaps of divine origin, are by no means universal and must be viewed as an invention of man rather than an order of God. Of course, we are completely trained to accept the idea of ownership of the earth and its products, raw and transformed. It seems not at all strange; in fact, it is quite difficult to imagine a society without such arrangements. If someone, some individual, didn't own that plot of land, that house, that factory, that machine, that tower of wheat, how would we function？ What would the rules be？ Whom would we buy from and how would we sell？
It is important to acknowledge a significant difference between achieving ownership simply by taking or claiming property and owning what we tend to call the "fruit of labor". If I, alone or together with my family, work on the land and raise crops, or if I make something useful out of natural material, it seems reasonable and fair to claim that the crops or the objects belong to me or my family, are my property, at least in the sense that I have first claim on them. Hardly anyone would dispute that. In fact, some of the early radical workingmen's movements made (an ownership) claim on those very grounds. As industrial organization became more complex, however, such issues became vastly more intricate. It must be clear that in modern society the social heritage of knowledge and technology and the social organization of manufacture and exchange account for far more of the productivity of industry and the value of what is produced than can be accounted for by the labor of any number of individuals. Hardly any person can now point and say, "That--that right there--is the fruit of my labor." We can say, as a society, as a nation--as a world, really--that what is produced is the fruit of our labor, the product of the whole society as a collectivity.
We have to recognize that the right of private individual ownership of property is man-made and constantly dependent on the extent to which those without property believe that the owner can make his claim stick.
According to the text, the concept of ownership probably
A．resulted from the unrecognized ancient history.
B．stemmed from the remote prehistoric times.
C．arose from the generous blessing of the Creator.
D．originated from the undetected distant periods.
According to psychologists, most people buy things ______.
A．to meet their basic needs in life
B．to enjoy spending money
C．for a different reason from the one they claim
D．to satisfy their inexplicable psychological needs
A.precede
B.recede
C.concede
D.proceed
The seller should lodge any claim for this consignment against the sellers () 30 days ()arrivalof the goods.
A．within; in
B．within; at
C．after; in
D．after; on
What can we learn from the conversation？
A．Nobody can claim to be absolutely pure.
B．Even if we are Tax payers, we have to buy our tickets.
C．Taking something from the company is understandable in some cases.
D．To tell the truth is always difficult.
The seller should lodge any claim for this consignment against the sellers()30 days ()arrival of the goods.
A.within,in
B.within,after
C.after in
D.after,on
为了保护您的账号安全，请在“简答题”公众号进行验证，点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证，验证成功后方可继续查看答案！
微信搜一搜
简答题
微信搜一搜
简答题
如搜索结果不匹配，请 
