题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

听力原文:W: You are on the right track. Fm just thinking you need to choose another topic.

M: Yes, you are right. I can't find adequate material for this topic. Maybe, I should write the essay on Shakespeare's poetry.

Q: What will the man probably do next?

(16)

A.He will choose a new topic to write the essay.

B.He will choose the novel written by Shakespeare as the topic.

C.He refuses to accept the man's advice.

D.He is on the wrong track.

提问人:网友sosoliuhu 发布时间:2022-01-07
参考答案
查看官方参考答案
如搜索结果不匹配,请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“听力原文:W: You are on the right t…”相关的问题
第1题
To free medical care,you need to choose_
点击查看答案
第2题
I’ve learned to be adaptable. There are times when I need to take the bull by the horns and just do it. "take the bull by the horns" means(to lead others)
点击查看答案
第3题
- I know yoga has an effect on the physical fitness. - But I focus more on the healing aspect of yoga.

A、I know yoga has an effect on the physical fitness in opposition to focusing more on the healing aspect of yoga.

B、I focus more on the healing aspect of yoga as opposed to the physical fitness.

C、/

D、/

点击查看答案
第4题
When I'm nervous, it helps me to concentrate on some trivial activity, such as washing dishes or watching a game show.

A、unusual

B、serious

C、unimportant

D、erratic

点击查看答案
第5题
Signal words are exactly what we need to note down in listening.
点击查看答案
第6题
1. Diner: Could you _______me the bill, please? Server: Ok. Wait a minute.

A、A: pay

B、B. bring

C、C. take

D、D. foot

点击查看答案
第7题
Section B

Directions: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A, B, C and D. You should decide on the best choice.

For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, using science for the construction of what we call modern civilization. Every dispensable item of contemporary technology, from canal locks to dial telophones to penicillin, was pieced together from the analysis of data provided by one or another series of scientific experiments. Three hundred years seems a long time for testing a new approach to human inter-living, long enough to set back for critical appraisal of the scientific method, maybe even long enough to vote on whether to go on with it or not. There is an argument.

Voices have been raised in protest since the beginning, rising in pitch and violence in the nineteenth century during the early stages of the industrial revolution, summoning urgent crowds into the streets on the issue of nuclear energy. "Give it hack," say some of the voices, "It doesn't really work, we've tried it and it doesn't work. Go back three hundred years and start again on something else less chancy for the race of man."

The principle discoveries in this century, taking all in all, are the glimpses of the depth of our ignorance of nature. Things that used to seem clear and rational, and matters of absolute certainty—Newtonian mechanics, for example—have slipped through our fingers; and we are left with a new set of gigantic puzzles, cosmic uncertainties, and ambiguities. Some of the laws of physics are amended every few years; some are canceled outright; some undergo revised versions of legislative intent as if they were acts of Congress.

Just thirty years ago we call it a biological revolution when the fantastic geometry of the DNA molecule was exposed to public view and the linear language of genetics was decoded. For a while, things seamed simple and clear: the cell was a neat little machine, a mechanical device ready for taking to pieces and reassembling, like a tiny watch. But just in the last few years it has become almost unbelievably complex, filled with strange parts whose functions are beyond today's imagining.

It is not just that there is more to do, there is everything to do. What lies ahead, or what can lie ahead if the efforts in basic research are continued, is much more than the conquest of human disease or the improvement of agricultural technology or the cultivation of nutrients in the sea. As we learn more about fundamental processes of living things in general we will learn more about ourselves.

What CANNOT be inferred from the first paragraph?

A.Scientific experiments in the past three hundred years have produced many valuable items.

B.For three hundred years there have been people holding a hostile attitude toward science.

C.Modern civilization depends on science so man supports scientific progress unanimously.

D.Some people think three hundred years is not long enough to set back for critical appraisal of scientific method.

点击查看答案
账号:
你好,尊敬的用户
复制账号
发送账号至手机
密码将被重置
获取验证码
发送
温馨提示
该问题答案仅针对搜题卡用户开放,请点击购买搜题卡。
马上购买搜题卡
我已购买搜题卡, 登录账号 继续查看答案
重置密码
确认修改
欢迎分享答案

为鼓励登录用户提交答案,简答题每个月将会抽取一批参与作答的用户给予奖励,具体奖励活动请关注官方微信公众号:简答题

简答题官方微信公众号

警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“简答题”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

微信搜一搜
简答题
点击打开微信
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反简答题购买须知被冻结。您可在“简答题”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
微信搜一搜
简答题
点击打开微信