题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

What Peter Backman said can be best described asA.conclusive.B.suggestive.C.instructive.D.

What Peter Backman said can be best described as

A.conclusive.

B.suggestive.

C.instructive.

D.subjective.

提问人:网友cailim 发布时间:2022-01-06
参考答案
查看官方参考答案
如搜索结果不匹配,请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“What Peter Backman said can be…”相关的问题
第1题
听力原文:M: How do you like Professor Backman's course on the history of philosophy? He is
a distinguished scholar on that subject.

W: He is a great teacher. But I'm having a hard time with the reading list. I feel I can't ever finish it.

Q: What problem does the woman have with the course?

(9)

A.She doesn't like the way the professor lectures.

B.She's having a hard time following the professor's lectures.

C.She is not interested in the course.

D.She's having difficulty with the heavy reading assignments.

点击查看答案
第2题
What was Peter's job?A.A banker.B.A runner.C.A mechanic.D.A pickpocket.

What was Peter's job?

A.A banker.

B.A runner.

C.A mechanic.

D.A pickpocket.

点击查看答案
第3题
—Peter, _____?—— Not too bad.

A.what’s up

B.what are you doing

C.what’s wrong with you

D.what’s the matter

点击查看答案
第4题
What is Peter's job title?A.Sales ExecutiveB.Marketing ManagerC.Managing Director

What is Peter's job title?

A.Sales Executive

B.Marketing Manager

C.Managing Director

点击查看答案
第5题
The British Court of Appeal has cut libel damages awarded to McDonald’s, the world’s large
st fast—food chain, against two penniless environment campaigners.

In 1997, the High Court in London found that environmental campaigners Helen Steel, aged 34, and Dave Morris, 44, were guilty of distributing a pamphlet containing allegations against McDonald’s and their fast food and its preparation. The trial lasted three years and brought to light much evidence about the way McDonald’s hamburger chain workers prepared, handled and served food, and the treatment of these workers by the American-owned company. The High Court in London awarded McDonald’s damages of 60,000 pounds (RMB 780,000) against the two penniless campaigners.

But in 1999, three Appeal Court Judges in London decided that the two defendants found guilty of libel against McDonald’s in 1997 would have the damages they have to pay to McDonald’s reduced to 40,000 pounds (RMB 520,000).

While upholding the libel ruling, the judges backed the defendants' claim the food carries health risks and said allegations McDonald’s workers suffer poor pay and conditions are "fair comment". The judges also backed a claim by the defendants that eating the company’s hamburgers can cause heart disease.

The claim that "if one eats enough McDonald’s food, one’s diet may well become high in fat..., with the very real risk of heart disease, is justified," said Lord Justice Pill, who was sitting in the Court of Appeal with Lord Justice May and Justice Keene.

The appeal decision is likely to be a further embarrassment to McDonald’s, whose three-year action against environmental campaigners Helen Steel and Dave Morris generated extensive negative publicity.

Peter Backman, chief executive of Food Service Intelligence, a research group, said: " McDonald’s is very conscious of what people say about them. They have got where they have by listening to consumers. I think their strategy will be to downplay the ruling, refute the comments, and thirdly, to do something about it." McDonald’s said it welcomed the Court of Appeal decision to uphold the 1997 libel ruling.

The company faces another $200,000 legal bill for the 23-day appeal hearing. Steel and Morris were to take the case to the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights to appeal against the damages awarded against them. They present much of their cases themselves and any lawyer’s fees are largely paid for by donations. The pair have yet to win court backing for claims that McDonald’s damages the environment, or that there are links between its hamburgers, cancer and food poisoning.

The fast-food chain has not yet recovered a penny of its original libel award from the defendants, who are refusing to hand over any money.

One benefit of the long trial was that

A.McDonald’s become more famous after that.

B.people knew a lot about the food processing in McDonald’s.

C.the way McDonald’s treated its workers has been improved.

D.the government got a sum of money from it.

点击查看答案
第6题
Peter: What's there to do at night? Clerk: There are clubs, concerts, players and so on.A.

Peter: What's there to do at night? Clerk: There are clubs, concerts, players and so on.

A.You make it

B.You find it

C.You manage it

D.You name it

点击查看答案
第7题
What's the customer's name?

A.Mike

B.Steve

C.John

D.Peter

点击查看答案
第8题
According to the professor, what was the specialty of Peter Julie's son, Paul?A.Painting.B

According to the professor, what was the specialty of Peter Julie's son, Paul?

A.Painting.

B.Architecture.

C.Photographing sculpture.

D.Photographing people.

点击查看答案
第9题
What did Peter Breen use to be?A.The woman's teacher.B.A workmate of the woman's husband.C

What did Peter Breen use to be?

A.The woman's teacher.

B.A workmate of the woman's husband.

C.The woman's schoolmate.

点击查看答案
第10题
What was Peter's job?A.A radio announcer.B.A bank employee.C.A car mechanic.D.A movie acto

What was Peter's job?

A.A radio announcer.

B.A bank employee.

C.A car mechanic.

D.A movie actor.

点击查看答案
账号:
你好,尊敬的用户
复制账号
发送账号至手机
获取验证码
发送
温馨提示
该问题答案仅针对搜题卡用户开放,请点击购买搜题卡。
马上购买搜题卡
我已购买搜题卡, 登录账号 继续查看答案
重置密码
确认修改
欢迎分享答案

为鼓励登录用户提交答案,简答题每个月将会抽取一批参与作答的用户给予奖励,具体奖励活动请关注官方微信公众号:简答题

简答题官方微信公众号

警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“简答题”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

微信搜一搜
简答题
点击打开微信
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反简答题购买须知被冻结。您可在“简答题”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
微信搜一搜
简答题
点击打开微信