![](https://lstatic.shangxueba.com/jiandati/h5/images/m_q_title.png)
-------______________? -------- I think it’s within the field of my study.
A、Can you tell me about yourself?
B、Why do you want this job?
C、How do you want this job?
D、Which do you want this job?
A、Can you tell me about yourself?
B、Why do you want this job?
C、How do you want this job?
D、Which do you want this job?
A、Mercantile capitalism
B、Neoliberalism
C、Venture capitalism
D、Post-modernity
A、No matter what
B、Although
C、In spite
D、Despite
B: As an experienced teacher of English, you know the trouble your students have and are ready to help.
You may use the following words and expressions:
vocabulary remember keep in mind jot down
no matter how context meaningful
Could you help me with ...
I have trouble with ...
My big problem is ...
... escape my mind ...
What does ... mean?
I'll give it a try.
That's not unusual.
Have you ever tried ...?
... become more meaningful ...
... learn them in the context.
I wish you success!
As expected, the most rigid opposition has come from the Catholic Church, which considers the embryo to be a living person from the moment of conception. Cloning aside, even research involving "spare" embryos (created for infertility treatments but not used. is condemned because it is morally wrong to use a person for the benefit of someone else. At the opposite end of the spectrum (范围)lie the hardcore utilitarians (功利主义)of science and business, who are generally astute (精明的)enough not to announce their politically incorrect views: namely that the embryo isjust another batch of cellular sludge (淤积;淤沉)that can and should be used like any other biological resource in the pursuit of medical research.
1.The purpose of therapeutic cloning is to.()
A.produce people
B.commercialize stem cells
C.treat various diseases
D.clone human embryo in Dolly
2.What triggered the debate across the industrial countries?()
A.The commercialization of cloned human embryos.
B.Legalizing the creation of cloned human embryos in Britain.
C.A theoretical flaw in the experiment of human embryos cloning.
D.The European Parliament's harsh criticism on the UK's decision.
3.In the 1990s the British researchers use embryos basically to.()
A.harvest stem cells
B.reform. the system of medical care
C.treat infertility and detect birth defects
D.study the possibility of organ transplants
4.The Catholic Church argue against human embryos cloning because.()
A.cloning creates spare embryos
B.it considers the embryo to be a living person
C.it may lead to reproductive cloning
D.it's morally wrong to use a person for the benefit of another one
5.The utilitarians of science and business think.()
A.human embryos cloning is a hard choice
B.it's politically incorrect to clone human embryos
C.the embryos should be used like any other biological resource
D.human embryos are important samples in the pursuit of medical research
The Open Source Applications Foundation has a different idea: to promote free software and innovation by creating cool new applications on a bare-bones budget. The not-for-profit OSAF was initially funded with $5 million from former Lotus Development Corp. founder Mitch Kapor. For Kapor, this is a fascinating departure. Twenty years ago he introduced one of the first killer applications of the PC age, the Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet; it was unabashedly for-profit and was closed-source.
But Kapor always had his heart in the counterculture, and after leaving his company he co-founded the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a cyber-rights organization. Though he has seen success as an investor, he feels strongly about the open-source movement, which posits that in the age of complex software many people working for nothing can duplicate or even exceed the efforts of the rake-in-the-bucks gang. And because the source code is available to all, anyone can improve the product. The continued success of the Linux-powered operating system and Apache Web servers shows that open source is no wild dream, but a serious challenge to the establishment.
Sometime next year the OSAF will begin testing its first product, a personal-information manager that directly takes on Microsoft's Outlook. Named after the famous mystery novelist, Chandler will run on Mac, Windows and Linux, be loaded with clever features and allow users to share information with others on things like calendar entries. And, of course, it will be free. Kapor has signed up an all-star team, including Lou Montulli (Netscape Navigator browser) and programming legend Andy Hertzfeld. Also participating: thousands of volunteers who believe in the barn-raising spirit of the open-source movement.
Ultimately, Kapor hopes the project will be self-supporting, with money coming from corporate sponsorships, foundations and licensing fees.
For the immediate future, Kapor thinks that Chandler will be simply another alternative in the shadow of the giant. But long term, the OSAF sees a sea change in the industry itself. "If Chandler works, I can't see why we couldn't do a word processor or a spreadsheet," says Kapor. After all, he predicts, "in 10 years Office and Windows will be commodities." Meaning that the Open Source Applications Foundation, or anyone else, will be able to plug its products—including an operating sys tem-into your computing world. Microsoft's will cost money. The others will be free. If Kapor has his way, it's a long good-bye for Microsoft's dominance.
Microsoft company in the software world
A.has taken a firm monopoly.
B.controlled all the innovation.
C.has no competitors.
D.developed the best software.
A、volume
B、weight
C、size
D、price
为了保护您的账号安全,请在“简答题”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!