题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

His company empowered the young engineer to negotiate the contract to be signed with the A

merican Microsoft.

A.enforced

B.strengthened

C.ordered

D.authorized

提问人:网友sun1735 发布时间:2022-01-07
参考答案
查看官方参考答案
如搜索结果不匹配,请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“His company empowered the youn…”相关的问题
第1题
Julian was asked to examine the demographic forces facing his employer, a clothing manufacturer. Which of the following factors is Julian most likely to examine?

A、Government regulations

B、Inflation

C、Manufacturing technology

D、Age of the population

E、Society's growing interest in exercise

点击查看答案
第2题

A Chinese trading company (the Buyer) entered a contract with a Japanese manufacturer (the Seller) of precision machinery and testing equipment for purchasing 15 sets of production lines and 8 sets of testing devices. The total value of the contract is 400,000 US dollars. Price terms: CFR Shanghai; Time of shipment: the end of September 2013; Payment terms: Buyer opens an irrevocable negotiable letter of credit in full amount two months prior to the date of shipment. Standard arbitration clauses were included in the sales contract. On September 30, 2013, the buyer opened a letter of credit through a bank in favour of the seller and no deposit was made. The seller, on October 8 and 31, shipped the goods in two lots, and negotiated the payment to the negotiating bank. The negotiating bank got repayment from the issuing bank. On October 19, the first lot of 15 sets of production lines arrived at the port of destination – Shanghai. On November 12, the second lot of 8 sets of testing devices arrived at the same port. Since the original copies of the bills of lading for the two lots were not available, the buyer took the goods from the shipping company using the copies of the bills of lading. The provincial commodity inspection bureau inspected the production lines and the testing devices. The inspection report issued by the authority shown that: 4 out of 15 sets of the production lines are not in conformity with the quality terms stipulated in the sales contract. These 4 sets of production lines cannot be used to manufacture standard-conforming products at all. The buyer insisted that the 15 sets of production lines should be used together. Since 4 sets of the production lines were of no use, the remaining 11 sets of qualified production lines should be rejected as well. Therefore, on December 15, 2013, the buyer sent a memo to the Japanese manufacturer, which requested that all 15 sets of production lines should be sent back to Japan. However, the Japanese seller neither signed the memo nor replied to the Chinese buyer’s request. The buyer finally brought the case to the CCPIT, the arbitration institute specified in the sales contract. The demands of the buyer were: 1). Return the 15 sets of the production lines. The seller should fully refund the payment and bear the costs and expenses associated with the return. 2). The 8 sets of the testing devices were late for delivery by six weeks than the stipulated date of shipment. Therefore, the seller should pay the fine of 40,000 US dollars for the delayed delivery. 3). All 15 sets of the production lines were rented out to another Chinese company. Because the 4 sets of faulty production lines, the buyer had already paid compensation of 15,000 US dollars to another Chinese company. The buyer demanded that the seller should bear the loss and pay the buyer 15,000 US dollars. Questions: 1. Other than the discrepancy and claim clauses, what kind of clause regarding dispute settlement should be included in the sales contract of this case? The buyer demanded a fine of 40,000 US dollars for late delivery of the testing devices to be paid by the Japanese manufacturer. If the Japanese manufacturer does pay the fine, could they terminate the contract? Why? 2. How would the arbitration court handle the demands of the buyer? Give your answers for the following subjects a. 15 sets of production lines b. 8 sets of testing devices c. economic loss to the Chinese company which rented the equipment 3. Since the Japanese manufacturer did not sign the memo and respond to the Chinese buyer, could the buyer bring the case to a court in China and sue the Japanese seller for damage and loss first before arbitration? Why? After the arbitration award was made, if the Japanese manufacturer refused to honour the award, what could the Chinese buyer do?

点击查看答案
第3题
根据样张,仿写一篇发盘函(报价函)
点击查看答案
第4题
根据样张,仿写一篇还盘函。
点击查看答案
账号:
你好,尊敬的用户
复制账号
发送账号至手机
密码将被重置
获取验证码
发送
温馨提示
该问题答案仅针对搜题卡用户开放,请点击购买搜题卡。
马上购买搜题卡
我已购买搜题卡, 登录账号 继续查看答案
重置密码
确认修改
欢迎分享答案

为鼓励登录用户提交答案,简答题每个月将会抽取一批参与作答的用户给予奖励,具体奖励活动请关注官方微信公众号:简答题

简答题官方微信公众号

警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“简答题”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

微信搜一搜
简答题
点击打开微信
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反简答题购买须知被冻结。您可在“简答题”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
微信搜一搜
简答题
点击打开微信