题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

Children will benefit a lot if______.A.their parents drive them to more placesB.they can g

Children will benefit a lot if______.

A.their parents drive them to more places

B.they can get more freedom to explore some close places without adult supervision

C.the cars in the city they live must give way to them

D.their parents keep them off the streets for safety

提问人:网友chjiwa 发布时间:2022-01-06
参考答案
查看官方参考答案
如搜索结果不匹配,请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“Children will benefit a lot if…”相关的问题
第1题
What's the passage mainly about?A.The worldwide popularity of Harry Potter.B.Adults benefi

What's the passage mainly about?

A.The worldwide popularity of Harry Potter.

B.Adults benefiting from reading Harry Potter.

C.The origin of Harry Potter as a children's book.

D.Reflections on Harry Potter's popularity among adults.

点击查看答案
第2题
I find this treatment very ________ to my health.A) advisableB) invaluableC) benefi

I find this treatment very ________ to my health.

A) advisable

B) invaluable

C) beneficial

D) worthy

点击查看答案
第3题
What can we learn from the fourth paragraph?A.The executive teams of both firms can benefi

What can we learn from the fourth paragraph?

A.The executive teams of both firms can benefit a lot from the merger.

B.The future of HP depends much on the merger.

C.The two sides are eager to make this deal.

D.Plan B can save HP out of trouble.

点击查看答案
第4题
信用证项下汇票的抬头一般作成______。 A.pay to bearer B.pay to ×××only C.pay to the order of benefi

信用证项下汇票的抬头一般作成______。

A.pay to bearer

B.pay to ×××only

C.pay to the order of beneficiary

D.open

点击查看答案
第5题
What is the difference between Joost and KaZaA according to Fredrik de Wahl?A.KaZaA benefi

What is the difference between Joost and KaZaA according to Fredrik de Wahl?

A.KaZaA benefited the industry which it entered.

B.KaZaA didn't impact the industry which it entered.

C.Joost doesn't threaten the industry which it's entering.

D.Joost negatively impacts the industry which it's entering.

点击查看答案
第6题
The person who does not pay for a public good ______.A.keeps himself from using its benefi

The person who does not pay for a public good ______.

A.keeps himself from using its benefit

B.cannot enjoy its benefit at any time

C.fails to keep its benefit from being used

D.enjoys its benefit all the same

点击查看答案
第7题
内部成本和外部成本,社会收益和私人收益(internal vs.external costs,social vs.pri-rate benefi

内部成本和外部成本,社会收益和私人收益(internal vs.external costs,social vs.pri-rate benefits)

点击查看答案
第8题
A letter of credit is a written undertaking by an issuing bank given to the seller (benefi

A letter of credit is a written undertaking by an issuing bank given to the seller (beneficiary) at the request, and on the instruction, of the buyer (applicant) to pay at sight or at a determinable future date up to a stated sum of money, within a prescribed time limit and against stipulated documents which______ the terms and conditions of the credit.

A、observe

B、by

C、transfer

D、comply with

点击查看答案
第9题
Section B – TWO questions ONLY to be attempted (a) Cate is an entity in the software indus

Section B – TWO questions ONLY to be attempted

(a) Cate is an entity in the software industry. Cate had incurred substantial losses in the fi nancial years 31 May 2004 to 31 May 2009. In the fi nancial year to 31 May 2010 Cate made a small profi t before tax. This included signifi cant non-operating gains. In 2009, Cate recognised a material deferred tax asset in respect of carried forward losses, which will expire during 2012. Cate again recognised the deferred tax asset in 2010 on the basis of anticipated performance in the years from 2010 to 2012, based on budgets prepared in 2010. The budgets included high growth rates in profi tability. Cate argued that the budgets were realistic as there were positive indications from customers about future orders. Cate also had plans to expand sales to new markets and to sell new products whose development would be completed soon. Cate was taking measures to increase sales, implementing new programs to improve both productivity and profi tability. Deferred tax assets less deferred tax liabilities represent 25% of shareholders’ equity at 31 May 2010. There are no tax planning opportunities available to Cate that would create taxable profi t in the near future. (5 marks)

(b) At 31 May 2010 Cate held an investment in and had a signifi cant infl uence over Bates, a public limited company. Cate had carried out an impairment test in respect of its investment in accordance with the procedures prescribed in IAS 36, Impairment of assets. Cate argued that fair value was the only measure applicable in this case as value-in-use was not determinable as cash fl ow estimates had not been produced. Cate stated that there were no plans to dispose of the shareholding and hence there was no binding sale agreement. Cate also stated that the quoted share price was not an appropriate measure when considering the fair value of Cate’s signifi cant infl uence on Bates. Therefore, Cate estimated the fair value of its interest in Bates through application of two measurement techniques; one based on earnings multiples and the other based on an option–pricing model. Neither of these methods supported the existence of an impairment loss as of 31 May 2010. (5 marks)

(c) At 1 April 2009 Cate had a direct holding of shares giving 70% of the voting rights in Date. In May 2010, Date issued new shares, which were wholly subscribed for by a new investor. After the increase in capital, Cate retained an interest of 35% of the voting rights in its former subsidiary Date. At the same time, the shareholders of Date signed an agreement providing new governance rules for Date. Based on this new agreement, Cate was no longer to be represented on Date’s board or participate in its management. As a consequence Cate considered that its decision not to subscribe to the issue of new shares was equivalent to a decision to disinvest in Date. Cate argued that the decision not to invest clearly showed its new intention not to recover the investment in Date principally through continuing use of the asset and was considering selling the investment. Due to the fact that Date is a separate line of business (with separate cash fl ows, management and customers), Cate considered that the results of Date for the period to 31 May 2010 should be presented based on principles provided by IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. (8 marks)

(d) In its 2010 fi nancial statements, Cate disclosed the existence of a voluntary fund established in order to provide a post-retirement benefi t plan (Plan) to employees. Cate considers its contributions to the Plan to be voluntary, and has not recorded any related liability in its consolidated fi nancial statements. Cate has a history of paying benefi ts to its former employees, even increasing them to keep pace with infl ation since the commencement of the Plan. The main characteristics of the Plan are as follows:

(i) the Plan is totally funded by Cate;

(ii) the contributions for the Plan are made periodically;

(iii) the post retirement benefi t is calculated based on a percentage of the fi nal salaries of Plan participants dependent on the years of service;

(iv) the annual contributions to the Plan are determined as a function of the fair value of the assets less the liability arising from past services.

Cate argues that it should not have to recognise the Plan because, according to the underlying contract, it can terminate its contributions to the Plan, if and when it wishes. The termination clauses of the contract establish that Cate must immediately purchase lifetime annuities from an insurance company for all the retired employees who are already receiving benefi t when the termination of the contribution is communicated. (5 marks)

Required:

Discuss whether the accounting treatments proposed by the company are acceptable under International Financial Reporting Standards.

Professional marks will be awarded in this question for clarity and quality of discussion. (2 marks)

The mark allocation is shown against each of the four parts above.

点击查看答案
第10题
The Committee of Sponsoring Organisations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission is an American

The Committee of Sponsoring Organisations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission is an American voluntary, private sector organisation and is unconnected to government or any other regulatory authority. It was established in 1985 to help companies identify the causes of fraudulent reporting and to create internal control environments able to support full and accurate reporting. It is named after its fi rst chairman, James Treadway, and has issued several guidance reports over the years including important reports in 1987, 1992 and 2006.

In 2009, COSO issued new ‘Guidance on monitoring internal control systems’ to help companies tighten internal controls and thereby enjoy greater internal productivity and produce higher quality reporting. The report, written principally by a leading global professional services fi rm but adopted by all of the COSO members, noted that ‘unmonitored controls tend to deteriorate over time’ and encouraged organisations to adopt wide ranging internal controls. It went on to say that, the ‘assessment of internal controls [can] ... involve a signifi cant amount of ... internal audit testing.’

After its publication, the business journalist, Mark Rogalski, said that the latest report contained ‘yet more guidance from COSO on how to make your company less productive by burdening it even more with non-productive things to do’ referring to the internal control guidance the 2009 report contains. He said that there was no industry sector-specifi c advice and that a ‘one-size-fi ts-all’ approach to internal control was ‘ridiculous’. He further argued that there was no link between internal controls and external reporting, and that internal controls are unnecessary for effective external reporting.

Another commentator, Claire Mahmood, wrote a reply to Rogalski’s column pointing to the views expressed in the 2009 COSO report that, ‘over time effective monitoring can lead to organisational effi ciencies and reduced costs associated with public reporting on internal control because problems are identifi ed and addressed in a proactive, rather than reactive, manner.’ She said that these benefi ts were not industry sector specifi c and that Rogalski was incorrect in his dismissal of the report’s value. She also said that although primarily concerned with governance in the USA, the best practice guidance from COSO could be applied by companies anywhere in the world. She said that although the USA, where COSO is based, is concerned with the ‘rigid rules’ of compliance, the advice ought to be followed by companies in countries with principles-based approaches to corporate governance because it was best practice.

Required:

(a) Distinguish between rules-based and principles-based approaches to internal control system compliance as described by Claire Mahmood and discuss the benefi ts to an organisation of a principles-based approach. (7 marks)

(b) Mr Rogalski is sceptical over the value of internal control and believes that controls must be industry-specifi c to be effective. Required: Describe the advantages of internal control that apply regardless of industry sector and briefl y explain the meaning of the statement, ‘unmonitored controls tend to deteriorate over time’. Your answer should refer to the case scenario as appropriate. (10 marks)

(c) The COSO report explains that ‘assessment of internal controls [can] ... involve a signifi cant amount of ... internal audit testing.’ Required: Defi ne ‘internal audit testing’ and explain the roles of internal audit in helping ensure the effectiveness of internal control systems. (8 marks)

点击查看答案
第11题
Ergo city authority administers environmental, social care, housing and cultural services
to the city of Ergo. The city itself has many social problems and a recent report from the local government auditor criticised the Chief Executive Offi cer (CEO) for not spending enough time and money addressing the pressing housing problems of the city.

Since 1970 the authority has had its own internal Information Technology (IT) department. However, there has been increasing criticism of the cost and performance of this department. The CEO has commented that ‘we seem to expand the department to cope with special demands (such as the millennium bug) but the department never seems to shrink back to its original size when the need has passed’. Some employees are lost through natural wastage, but there have never been any redundancies in IT and the labour laws of the nation, and strong trade unions within the authority, make it diffi cult to make staff redundant.

In the last few years there has been an on-going dispute between managers in the IT department and managers in the fi nance function. The dispute started due to claims about the falsifi cation of expenses but has since escalated into a personal battle between the director of IT and the fi nance director. The CEO has had to intervene personally in this dispute and has spent many hours trying to reconcile the two sides. However, issues still remain and there is still tension between the managers of the two departments.

A recent internal human resources (HR) survey of the IT department found that, despite acknowledging that they received above average pay, employees were not very satisfi ed. The main complaints were about poor management, the ingratitude of user departments, (‘we are always being told that we are overheads, and are not core to the business of the authority’) and the absence of promotion opportunities within the department. The ingratitude of users is despite the IT department running a relatively fl exible approach to fulfi lling users’ needs. There is no cross-charging for IT services provided and changes to user requirements are accommodated right up to the release of the software. The director of IT is also critical of the staffi ng constraints imposed on him. He has recently tried to recruit specialists in web services and ‘cloud computing’ without any success. He also says that ‘there are probably other technologies that I have not even heard of that we should be exploring and exploiting’.

The CEO has been approached by a large established IT service company, ProTech, to form. a new company ProTech-Public that combines the public sector IT expertise of the authority with the commercial and IT knowledge of ProTech. The joint company will be a private limited company, owned 51% by ProTech and 49% by the city authority. All existing employees in the IT department and the IT technology of the city authority will be transferred to ProTech who will then enter into a 10 year outsourcing arrangement with the city authority. The CEO is very keen on the idea and he sees many other authorities following this route.

The only exception to this transfer of resources concerns the business analysts who are currently in the IT department. They will be retained by the authority and located in a new business analysis department reporting directly to the CEO.

The CEO has suggested that the business analysts have the brief to ‘deliver solutions that demonstrably offer benefi ts to the authority and to the people of the city, using information technology where appropriate’. They need to be ‘outward looking and not constrained by current processes and technology’. They will also be responsible for liaising between users and the newly outsourced IT company and, for the fi rst time, defi ning business cases with users.

In principle, the creation of the new company and the outsourcing deal has been agreed. One of the conditions of the contract, inserted by the fi nance director, is that the new company achieves CMMI level 5 within three years. The current IT department has been recently assessed as CMMI level 2. ProTech has recently been assessed at CMMI level 3.

Required:

(a) Evaluate the potential benefi ts to the city authority and its IT employees, of outsourcing IT to ProTech-Public. (12 marks)

(b) The role of the business analyst is currently being re-designed.

Analyse what new or enhanced competencies the business analysts will require to undertake their proposed new role in the city authority. (7 marks)

(c) Explain the principles of CMMI and the advantages to ProTech-Public of achieving CMMI level 5. (6 marks)

点击查看答案
账号:
你好,尊敬的用户
复制账号
发送账号至手机
获取验证码
发送
温馨提示
该问题答案仅针对搜题卡用户开放,请点击购买搜题卡。
马上购买搜题卡
我已购买搜题卡, 登录账号 继续查看答案
重置密码
确认修改
欢迎分享答案

为鼓励登录用户提交答案,简答题每个月将会抽取一批参与作答的用户给予奖励,具体奖励活动请关注官方微信公众号:简答题

简答题官方微信公众号

警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“简答题”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

微信搜一搜
简答题
点击打开微信
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反简答题购买须知被冻结。您可在“简答题”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
微信搜一搜
简答题
点击打开微信