题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
[主观题]
某合同商品检验条款中规定以装船地商检报告为准。但在目的港交付货物时却发现品质与约定规格不符。
买方经当地商检机构检验并凭其出具的检验证书向卖方索赔，卖方却以上述商检条款拒赔。请问：卖方拒赔是否合理？
提问人：网友reed591
发布时间：2022-01-07
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
如搜索结果不匹配，请 您可能会需要：
安装简答题APP，拍照搜题省时又省心！
更多“某合同商品检验条款中规定以装船地商检报告为准。但在目的港交付…”相关的问题
第1题
某公司以CIF鹿特丹与外商成交一批货物，按发票金额110%投保一切险及战争险。买卖合同中的支付条款规定为“Paymet by L/C”。国外来证条款中有如下问句：“Payment under this creditwill be made by us only after arrival ofgoods at Rotterdam”。(该证项下的款项在货到鹿特丹后由我行支付)受益人在审证时未发现，因此，未请对方修改。我方某公司在交单结汇时，议付行也未提出异议。不幸60%货物在途中被大火烧毁，船到目的港后开证行拒付全部货款。问：开证行拒付是否合理?为什么?
点击查看答案
第2题
我出口公司A向新加坡公司B以CIF条件出口一批土特产，B公司又将该批货转卖给马来西亚公司C。货到新加坡后，B公司发现货物的质量有问题，但B公司仍然将原货转销给马来西亚。其后，B公司在合同规定的索赔期限内凭马来西亚商检机构签发的检验证书，向A公司提出退货要求。就本案分析正确的有（ ）。
A、A公司应该拒绝B公司要求。
B、根据《公约》规定，收货人发现货物有问题应该维持货物原状，进行加工活转卖就是对货物的侵权，丧失向卖方索赔的权利
C、A公司不应该拒绝B的要求，B在索赔期限内，凭借商检机构的商检证书可以向A索赔
D、以上都对
第3题
我外贸公司向国外B公司进口普通豆饼2万吨，8月交货。在4月，B商豆饼收购地发生洪灾，收购计划落空。B致电我公司A要求按不可抗力事件处理，免除其交货责任。
A、B公司要求不合理，因为货物还在生长期，并没有划归合同项下
B、B公司要求合理，符合不可抗力条件
C、B公司要求不合理，但可以要求延迟或变更履行请求
D、B公司要求合理，应该解除合同
第4题
In April 2013, one foreign trade company of China signed a tea export contract with a Canadian importer, requiring a proper packing ,with trade term of CIF Ottawa, covering all risks by PICC. The manufacturer lowered down the humidity of tea to the scale specified in the contract at the last procedure, packed the tea in the containers made of hard paper then in cartons with double layers. The goods were shipped in container and arrived in Ottawa on May 2013. But ,the result of the spection at destination port indicates: all tea has gone off and moldy, the total loss reached one hundred thousand dollars. But ,the temperature and humnidity in the manufacturing place and the import country are modest, the transportation is normal and smooth. Who shall take the responsibility and make compensation for the loss?which are the following analysis correct?
A、The carrier don't take the responsibility,because the transportation is normal
B、The problem is due to the package for the tea cannot meet the requirement of the anti-humidity for common transporataion
C、The main reason is package which occurred before the transportation ,so the manufacturer shall take de responsibility and make compensation for the loss.
D、The loss shall be covered in All Risks, so the premiumer should take the responsibility tof the compensation.
第5题
20,000 tons of bean-made cake were going to be imported from Argentina to China, with the scheduled delivery time by the end of Aug. and resold in Europe. However,the scheduled purchase place was attacked by flood leading to the purchase plan's failure, the Argentina seller required for the exemption from the contract fulfilment according to Forece Majeure..as the Chinese buyer ,how to settle the matter?The following analysis,( )are correct?
A、The convention is appicable to the contract unless a special agreement is made between both sides
B、In accordance with the Convention, the event in Argentina is not a Force Majeure as the result of the event can be overcome.the bean cake is a kind of substitutable product which can be pruchase in other countries or rejions as no specific origin was stipulateed in the contract. Moreover, there were still four months left for delivry from the attack of flood
C、The Chinese buyer may import the bean cakes from other suppliers and claim agaist the Argentina seller for the price difference or compensation
D、The event in Argentina is a Force Majeure ,so the Chinese buyer may request delay to execute the contract.
