题目内容（请给出正确答案）

[主观题]

（1) L/CIRREVOCABLE DOCUMENTARY CREDIT HUA CHIAO CO...

(1) L/CIRREVOCABLE DOCUMENTARY CREDIT HUA CHIAO COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. 88-89 Des Voeux Road, Central Hongkong No. F-07567 Applicant: J. Brown & Co., 175 Queen’s Way, Hong Kong Beneficiary: JiangXi Comfort Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. Nanchang, China Advising Bank: Bank of China, JiangXi Branch, Nanchang Negotiating Bank: Bank of China, JiangXi Branch, Nanchang Date and place of issue: 2016/09/28 Hong Kong Date and place of expiry: 2016/11/30 Hong Kong Amount: USD 26,700.00 (SAY UNITED STATES DOLLARS TWENTY SIX THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED ONLY) Partial shipments and transshipment are prohibited. Shipment from Shanghai, China to Hong Kong, latest 2016/11/30. Credit available against presentation of the documents detailed herein and of your draft at 90 days’ sight for full invoice value. ü Signed commercial invoice in quadruplicate. ü Full set of clean on board ocean bills of lading, made out to order of HUA CHIAO COMMERCIAL BANK LTD, marked “Freight Prepaid”. ü Insurance certificate or policy endorsed in blank for full invoice value plus 10%, covering ALL Risks and War Risk. Covering 50 doz, woolen sweaters, S105, @USD120 per doz. CFR Hong Kong 60 doz, woolen sweaters, M107, @USD150 per doz. CFR Hong Kong 70 doz, woolen sweaters, L109, @USD180 per doz. CFR Hong Kong As per Contract No. 28KG063 (2) Major terms and conditions in the corresponding S/C 合同号码：28KG603 卖方：江西康福特进出口公司买方：J. Brown & Co., 175 Queen’s Way, Hong Kong 商品：羊毛衫 S105 50打；M107 60打；L109 70打价格：S105 每打120美元CFR香港 M107 每打150美元CFR香港 L109 每打180美元CFR香港总金额：27,600.00 美元交货期：2016年11月，不允许分批装运，可转运。付款条件：不可撤销的、见票后90天付款的信用证，有效期为装运后15天，在中国到期。

提问人：网友liu2008 发布时间：2022-01-07

参考答案

抱歉！暂无答案，正在努力更新中……

如搜索结果不匹配，请联系老师获取答案

您可能会需要：

重置密码查看订单联系客服

安装简答题APP，拍照搜题省时又省心！

更多“（1) L/CIRREVOCABLE DOCUMENTARY…”相关的问题

第1题

如信用证规定“ COVERING MARINERISKSCOMPANY OF CHINA DD1／1／1982”，则出口公司（）

A、只能投保平安险

B、只能投保水渍险

C、只能投保一切险

D、可投保平安险、水渍险及一切险中的任一种

点击查看答案

第2题

LETTER OF CREDIT NO.: YS1234 BENEFICIARY:CHINA MACHINERY IMP & EXP CO.,NINGBO BRANCH AMOUNT:USD 18 400.00 LIST OF DOCUMENTS: …… INSURANCE POLICY IN DUPLICATE BLANK ENDORSED COVERING ALL RISKS AND WAR RISK FOR 110% INVOICE VALUE CLAIM AT LONDON,ENGLAND COVERING:400SETS BUTTERFLY SEWING MACHINES PACKING:IN WOODEN CASES OF 1 SET EACH SHIPMENT:FROM NINGBO TO LONDON,ENGLANDBY VESSEL "HONGZHEN"V.65 ON JULY 15,2017 WITH TRANSSHIPMENT AT HONGKONG INVOICE NO.:MIE201156 SPECIAL CONDITIONS : ALL DOCUMENTS MUST SHOW THE L/C NO. 补充资料： CONTRACT NO.：2017003 POLICY NO.：20170712 B/L NO.：20171235

点击查看答案

第3题

Payment is to be made ______ confirmed irrevocable L/C payable by draft at sight to be opened 30 days before the time of shipment.

点击查看答案

第4题

A beneficiary receives an Irrevocable Documentary Credit for which USD 22,500.00 may be drawn during each month of the Documentary Credit's one-year validity. The Documentary Credit also indicates that reinstatement is on a cumulative basis. Full monthly drawings were made during the first, second, fourth, fifth and seventh months and there have been no other drawings. In the last month of the Documentary Credit's validity, the beneficiary expects to make a final shipment. What is the maximum value available for this final drawing？

(1)( ) USD112,500.00 (2)( ) USD135,000.00

(3)( ) USD157,500.00 (4)( ) USD180.000.00

点击查看答案

第5题

Which of the following means “不可撤销信用证”?

A、L/C at sight.

B、Irrevocable L/C.

C、Usance L/C

D、Revocable L/C.

点击查看答案

第6题

A ( ) credit is normally used in processing trade.

A、back to back

B、revolving

C、reciprocal

D、transferable

点击查看答案

第7题

In China, China Food and Drug Administration is under the direct supervision of The General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ).

点击查看答案

第8题

A Chinese LED lights manufacturer signed a sales contract with a French importer for selling 5,400 pieces of LED light bulbs. The time of shipment of the ordered goods is the end of September of 2015. On September 11, the manufacturer’ production facility and warehouse caught heavy fire and all the buildings and stocks were destroyed by fire. The preliminary investigation on the cause of the fire conducted by the local fire department suggested that the fire was caused by lighting. The Chinese LED lights manufacturer would like to notice the French buyer about the incident and cancel the delivery of the LED light bulbs citing the Force Majeure clauses of the sales contract. Questions: Based on this case, please answer the following questions. 1). Is the fire a Force Majeure event? Why? Please give the answer according to the elements that constitute a Force Majeure event. 2). Could the Chinese manufacturer terminate the performance of the contract and why? If yes, the act of termination of the contract is regulated by which international treaty on international trade? What should the Chinese manufacturer do in order to properly invoke 援引 the Force Majeure clause and be exempted from performing the contract?

点击查看答案

第9题

A Chinese trading company (the Buyer) entered a contract with a Japanese manufacturer (the Seller) of precision machinery and testing equipment for purchasing 15 sets of production lines and 8 sets of testing devices. The total value of the contract is 400,000 US dollars. Price terms: CFR Shanghai; Time of shipment: the end of September 2013; Payment terms: Buyer opens an irrevocable negotiable letter of credit in full amount two months prior to the date of shipment. Standard arbitration clauses were included in the sales contract. On September 30, 2013, the buyer opened a letter of credit through a bank in favour of the seller and no deposit was made. The seller, on October 8 and 31, shipped the goods in two lots, and negotiated the payment to the negotiating bank. The negotiating bank got repayment from the issuing bank. On October 19, the first lot of 15 sets of production lines arrived at the port of destination – Shanghai. On November 12, the second lot of 8 sets of testing devices arrived at the same port. Since the original copies of the bills of lading for the two lots were not available, the buyer took the goods from the shipping company using the copies of the bills of lading. The provincial commodity inspection bureau inspected the production lines and the testing devices. The inspection report issued by the authority shown that: 4 out of 15 sets of the production lines are not in conformity with the quality terms stipulated in the sales contract. These 4 sets of production lines cannot be used to manufacture standard-conforming products at all. The buyer insisted that the 15 sets of production lines should be used together. Since 4 sets of the production lines were of no use, the remaining 11 sets of qualified production lines should be rejected as well. Therefore, on December 15, 2013, the buyer sent a memo to the Japanese manufacturer, which requested that all 15 sets of production lines should be sent back to Japan. However, the Japanese seller neither signed the memo nor replied to the Chinese buyer’s request. The buyer finally brought the case to the CCPIT, the arbitration institute specified in the sales contract. The demands of the buyer were: 1). Return the 15 sets of the production lines. The seller should fully refund the payment and bear the costs and expenses associated with the return. 2). The 8 sets of the testing devices were late for delivery by six weeks than the stipulated date of shipment. Therefore, the seller should pay the fine of 40,000 US dollars for the delayed delivery. 3). All 15 sets of the production lines were rented out to another Chinese company. Because the 4 sets of faulty production lines, the buyer had already paid compensation of 15,000 US dollars to another Chinese company. The buyer demanded that the seller should bear the loss and pay the buyer 15,000 US dollars. Questions: 1. Other than the discrepancy and claim clauses, what kind of clause regarding dispute settlement should be included in the sales contract of this case? The buyer demanded a fine of 40,000 US dollars for late delivery of the testing devices to be paid by the Japanese manufacturer. If the Japanese manufacturer does pay the fine, could they terminate the contract? Why? 2. How would the arbitration court handle the demands of the buyer? Give your answers for the following subjects a. 15 sets of production lines b. 8 sets of testing devices c. economic loss to the Chinese company which rented the equipment 3. Since the Japanese manufacturer did not sign the memo and respond to the Chinese buyer, could the buyer bring the case to a court in China and sue the Japanese seller for damage and loss first before arbitration? Why? After the arbitration award was made, if the Japanese manufacturer refused to honour the award, what could the Chinese buyer do?

点击查看答案

第10题

根据样张，仿写一篇发盘函（报价函）

点击查看答案

警告：系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全，请在“简答题”公众号进行验证，点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证，验证成功后方可继续查看答案！

微信搜一搜

简答题

点击打开微信

警告：系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

抱歉，您的账号因涉嫌违反简答题购买须知被冻结。您可在“简答题”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封，或联系客服。

微信搜一搜

简答题

点击打开微信